I want a Jeep!

Jeeps Jeeps Jeeps!

Powered by Genesis

Dangerous Tendency in the Off-road World

Toyata RAV4 - where it started The times they are a-changing… That’s what I am saying to myself watching the new crossover breed replacing the trusted off-road veterans. Or, may be, the crossover tribe is not so new after all, and by now has claimed its right to the large portion of the offroad market. This is particularly true of Canada, but of other countries, where the the high fuel prices forced the owners to exchange their SUVs for smaller crossovers. The latest category become incredibly popular among both men and women, ranging in size of the vehicles from tiny first generation Toyota RAV4 and Honda CRV to much larger behemoths like Audy Q7 or Ford Escape.

 While all of this is taking place, car manufacturers are shifting the priorities towards comfort and appearance, sacrificing traditional off-road qualities. This brings us to a certain crisis of the off-road genre, where only a few vehicles like Land Rover Defender or Jeep Wrangler still put off-road capability over comfort and handling. One could still argue Audy Q7 crossoverthat many of the pickups are 4X4, but let’s face it, the longer wheel base and often times a transfer case without a law range will hardly satisfy serious off-roaders.

More so, quite a few vehicles that had made a name for themselves as serious conquerors of uneven terrain have obviously decided to jump on the bandwagon. Take Ford Explorer for example. The first two generations derived from Ford Ranger pick up base did pretty well off-road, while the third Explorer came in 2002 without locking differentials, with electronically controlled transfer case and with a questionable ground clearance of 19 cm, making it usable only for soft-roading. While the fourth generation Explorer wasn’t that much different from the third, fifth generation Ford Explorer which debuted in 2010 was a true crossover with its monocoque body and a number of electronic terrain management systems that proved to be unusable even on the most modest off-road.

Land Rover Defender - trusted veteran
Land Rover Defender - trusted veteran

Not to mention the latest Jeep Grand Cherokee, even though the previous Grands weren’t built on a frame, but still provided fantastic off-roading capabilities. Well, take a look now at the Grand Cherokee SRT-8, on which all the off-roading gear was removed. And what about BMW X5 and X3 or Mercedes ML – ever tried taking one of those things mudding?

 Nonetheless, there are still honest vehicles that can do off-road stock. Clearly Land Rover Defender, all of Jeep Wranglers, the older Mercedes G-class/Puch, Cherokees 1-3 generation, Nissan Patrol and Toyota Land-cruiser, Mitsubishi Pajero and of course Hummer H1/HUMVEE. The others, be it Ford Edge or Nissan Rogue, or Volvo XC-90 should be treated for what they are – crossovers – a breeding of SUV,

Third generation Cherokee
Third generation Cherokee

station wagon and of a minivan. That’s the direction SUV manufacturers are going…

Comments

  1. James Thomas says

    December 15, 2017 at 12:49 pm

    101% percent this is the reason why people have to add extra offroad kits or in simple words suspension lift kits into their vehicles, today vehicles are not par to true offroad experience.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to James Thomas Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeeps

  • Cherokee
  • CJ
  • Commander
  • Compass
  • concept
  • Concept Cars
  • FC
  • hurricance
  • liberty
  • Patriot
  • TJ
  • willys
  • Wrangler

Recent Comments

  • Timothy Turner on Jeep Wrangler YJ Wiring Diagram
  • David P McKinnon on Jeep Wrangler YJ Wiring Diagram
  • James Thomas on Dangerous Tendency in the Off-road World
  • Heather Miller on Jeep Wrangler YJ Wiring Diagram
  • Robert Wall on Jeep Wrangler YJ Wiring Diagram

Archives

  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • April 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005